difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330

[Notice 12-25 (FAQ 23)]. [FAQ 5.2]. Firms do not have to document or individually approve every "hold" recommendation.91 As with recommendations of other types of investment strategies or of purchases, sales or exchanges of securities, firms may use a risk-based approach to documenting and supervising "hold" recommendations. Rule 2330 requires a registered principal to review and determine whether to approve a customers application for a deferred variable annuity [Notice 12-55 (FAQ 10(b)]. A broker who sought to increase his commissions by recommending that customers use margin so that they could purchase larger numbers of securities. Would a firm violate the suitability rule if it makes recommendations to customers for whom it has not obtained all of the customer-specific information listed in FINRA Rule 2111(a)? [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 5)], A1.4. FINRA cautioned, however, that, "if the associated person remains uncertain about the potential risks and rewards of a product, or has reason to believe that the firm failed to address a particular issue or has done so in an incomplete or inaccurate manner, then the associated person would need to engage in further inquiry before recommending the product." 73 Robin B. McNabb, 54 S.E.C. The answer depends on the facts and circumstances of the particular case. FINRA Rule 2211 sets forth the requirements and standards for communication with the public regarding variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts. Firms must attempt to obtain and analyze relevant customer-specific information. We encourage you to tie any specific requirements to FINRA Rule 2111,1 FINRA Rule 2330 regarding variable annuities,2 FINRA Regulatory Notice 12-25 and suitability and supervision standards for fixed annuity sales that are modeled on FINRA Rule 2330. Id. In addition to using reasonable diligence to obtain and analyze certain specific factors about the customer, the new suitability rule requires a broker to consider "any other information the customer may disclose" in connection with the recommendation. FINRA stated that, "[t]o the extent that a customer account at a broker-dealer can be discretionary under applicable federal securities laws, the suitability rule generally would not apply where a firm refrains from selling a security." A customer could proceed in such a manner, but a firm should evidence the customer's intent to use different investment profiles or investment-profile factors for the different accounts. 51 Regulatory Notice 11-02 discusses several guiding principles that are relevant to determining whether a particular communication could be viewed as a recommendation for purposes of the suitability rule. 23 Investment profile is a defined term under the proposed rule that includes age, other investments, financial situation, tax status, investment objectives, investment experience, investment time horizon, liquidity needs, risk tolerance, and any other information a retail investor might disclose in connection with a recommendation. No. 297, 310, 2004 SEC LEXIS 277, at *23-24 (2004) (stating that a "broker's recommendations must be consistent with his customer's best interests" and are "not suitable merely because the customer acquiesces in [them]"); Wendell D. Belden, 56 S.E.C. FINRA explained that, although due diligence reviews by such committees can be extremely beneficial (see, e.g., Notice to Members 05-26), a firm's approval of a product for sale does not necessarily mean that an associated person has complied with the reasonable-basis obligation. Note: With this guidance, FINRA attempts to present information in a format that is easily understandable. Q8.2. See SEC Division of Corporation Finance: Standard Industrial Classification. Although a firm is not required to affirmatively ask customers if there is anything else it should know about them, the better practice is to attempt to gain as much relevant information as possible before making recommendations. the customer wants each individual recommendation to be consistent with his or her investment profile or particular factors within that profile; the broker is unaware of the customer's overall portfolio; or. 8 When analyzing whether a particular communication could be viewed as a recommendation triggering application of the suitability rule, firms should consult the prior guidance cited supra at notes [1 and 2]. 2008)]; see also Scott Epstein, Exchange Act Rel. "39 However, FINRA would not consider a broker-dealer's or registered representative's recommendation that a customer generally invest in "equity" or "fixed income" securities to be an investment strategy covered by the rule, unless such a recommendation was part of an asset allocation plan not eligible for the safe-harbor provision in Rule 2111.03 (discussed [below in FAQ 4.7]).40 The "investment strategy" language would apply to recommendations to customers to invest in more specific types of securities, such as high dividend companies or the "Dogs of the Dow,"41 or in a market sector, regardless of whether the recommendations identify particular securities.42 It also would apply to recommendations to customers generally to use a bond ladder, day trading, "liquefied home equity,"43 or margin strategy involving securities, irrespective of whether the recommendations mention particular securities. 45402, 2002 SEC LEXIS 284, at *20-21 & n.10 (Feb. 6, 2002) (holding that the defendant broker "controlled" the account because he essentially was a co-conspirator with the institutional customer's investment officer, who was authorized to place orders for the institutional customer's account). Q4.1. The hold recommendation must be explicit.5, Q1.3. See, e.g., FAQ [1.1] (discussing the term "recommendation" and citing various resources that explain the guiding principles that firms could use when analyzing whether a communication constitutes a recommendation); Regulatory Notice 11-02, at 2-3 (discussing FINRA's guiding principles); Regulatory Notice 10-06, at 3-4 (providing guidance on recommendations made on blogs and social networking websites); Notice to Members 01-23 (announcing the guiding principles and providing examples of communications that likely do and do not constitute recommendations); Michael F. Siegel, Exchange Act Rel. 282, 284, 1993 SEC LEXIS 41, at *5 (1993) ("[O]ptions transactions involve a high degree of financial risk. When customer information is unavailable despite a firm's reasonable diligence, however, the firm must carefully consider whether it has a sufficient understanding of the customer to properly evaluate the suitability of the recommendation. 35415, 1995 SEC LEXIS 481, at *2-3 (Feb. 24, 1995) ("His excessive trading yielded an annualized commission to equity ratio ranging between 12.1% and 18.0%."). No. A hold recommendation involving shares of a blue chip stock ordinarily would not present the type of risk, absent unusual facts, that would require a detailed analysis or documentation. C01020025, 2004 NASD Discip. The customer's investment profile, for example, is critical to the assessment, as are a host of product- or strategy-related factors in addition to cost, such as the product's or strategy's investment objectives, characteristics (including any special or unusual features), liquidity, risks and potential benefits, volatility and likely performance in a variety of market and economic conditions. 90 As discussed in [FAQ 4.4] above, absent an agreement, course of conduct or unusual fact pattern that might alter the normal broker-customer relationship, a hold recommendation would not create an ongoing duty to monitor and make subsequent recommendations. A8.3. Can a customer with multiple accounts at a single firm have different investment profiles or investment-profile factors (e.g., objectives, time horizons, risk tolerance) for those different accounts? If a firm's call center informs customers that they are permitted to continue to maintain their investments at the firm under such circumstances, would FINRA consider those communications to be "hold" recommendations triggering application of the new suitability rule? ), cert. [Notice 11-25 (FAQ 8)], A4.4. Q9.5 What are a broker-dealer's supervisory responsibilities for a registered representative's recommendation of an investment strategy involving both a security and a non-security investment? A broker's use of in-and-out trading ordinarily is a strong indicator of excessive trading. 91 Firms are reminded, however, that copies of all communications relating to their business as such and memoranda of brokerage orders are required to be preserved for three years. What is the scope of the safe-harbor provision in Rule 2111.03 regarding a firm's use of an asset allocation model? In general, an associated person may rely on a firm's fair and balanced explanation of the potential risks and rewards of a product. 52 Specifically, the rule [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 22)], A5.1. The reasonable-basis obligation has two components: a broker must (1) perform reasonable diligence to understand the nature of the recommended security or investment strategy involving a security or securities, as well as the potential risks and rewards, and (2) determine whether the recommendation is suitable for at least some investors based on that understanding.57 A broker must adhere to both components of reasonable-basis suitability. Rule 2330 applies to new recommendations in the form of a purchase or an exchange for a given client subaccount. This rule does not apply to: Any qualified plan under Section 3 (a) (12) (C) of the Exchange Act or under Sections 403 (b), 457 (b), or 457 (f) of the IRS What if a customer refuses to provide certain customer-specific information? No. In many circumstances, the answer is yes. 80 Compare FINRA Rules 2111(b) and 4512(c) with NASD IM-2310-3. Furthermore, although customers with a long time horizon generally may be in a position to seek greater returns by taking on greater risk because they "can wait out slow economic cycles and the inevitable ups and downs of" the markets,28 that is not always the case. difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 on Enero 16, 2021 Section 2 of the Order of the Supreme Court, dated Dec. 4, 1967, provided: "That the foregoing rules shall take effect on In addition, FINRA explained that, where a firm allows a customer to use different investment profiles or factors for different accounts rather than using a single customer profile for all of the customer's accounts, a firm could not borrow profile factors from the different accounts to justify a recommendation that would not be appropriate for the account for which the recommendation was made. Harry Gliksman, 54 S.E.C. 2010)]; Dane S. Faber, 57 S.E.C. LEXIS 36, at *22 (NAC Oct. 3, 2011) (same); Dep't of Enforcement v. Cody, No. 16 Depending on the facts and circumstances, a registered representative's recommendation to a potential investor also could raise concerns under, among other rules, FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade); FINRA Rule 2020 (Use of Manipulative, Deceptive or Other Fraudulent Devices); Rule 2210 (Communications with the Public); and NASD Rule 3040 (Private Securities Transactions of an Associated Person); see also Dep't of Enforcement v. Salazar, No. 35 For certain requirements related to day trading, see FINRA Rules 2130 and 2270. [Notice 11-25 (FAQ 3)]. ", Q1.2. A6.1. 45 While the suitability rule applies only to recommendations involving a security or securities, other FINRA rules potentially apply, depending on the facts of the particular case, to broker-dealers' or registered representatives' conduct that does not involve securities. 112-106, 126 Stat. Yes. However, this standard does require that the system be a product of sound thinking and within the bounds of common sense, taking into consideration the factors that are unique to a member's business." See also [infra note 86; Regulatory Notice 12-25, at 19 n.12]. A turnover rate greater than six creates a presumption that the trading was excessive. As noted above in the answer to [FAQ 8.1], FINRA has not endorsed or promoted any certificate. The rule thus explicitly permits a suitability analysis to be performed within the context of a customer's other investments. Q3.7. SEA Rule 17a-3 also states that the broker-dealer must furnish such customer or owner a copy of the required account record information or alternative document with all information required by SEA Rule 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(A), including an explanation of any terms regarding investment objectives, for verification within 30 days of account opening and at least once every 36 months thereafter. 933, 935, 1964 SEC LEXIS 497, at *3-4 (1964) (same); Dep't of Enforcement v. Evans, No. What factors determine whether a recommendation has been made for purposes of the suitability rule? However, if the associated person remains uncertain about the potential risks and rewards of a product or has reason to believe that the firm failed to address a particular issue or has done so in an incomplete or inaccurate manner, then the associated person would need to engage in further inquiry before recommending the product. 71 See Belden, 56 S.E.C. "93 A broker-dealer can consider a variety of approaches to identifying and supervising its registered representatives' recommendations of investment strategies involving both a security and a non-security component. Q4.6. For example, a firm may conclude that age is irrelevant regarding all customers that are entities or liquidity needs are irrelevant regarding all customers for whom only liquid securities will be recommended. FINRA previously stated that, although a firm has a general obligation to evidence compliance with applicable FINRA rules, the suitability rule does not include explicit documentation requirements, except in a situation where a firm determines not to seek certain customer information in the first place.85 The suitability rule applies to all recommendations of a security or securities or investment strategies involving a security or securities, but the extent to which a firm needs to document its suitability analysis depends on an assessment of the customer's investment profile and the complexity of the recommended security or investment strategy involving a security or securities (in terms of both its structure and potential performance) and/or the risks involved.86. Has FINRA endorsed or approved any of these certificates? As noted above in the answer to [FAQ 3.3], however, a broker cannot make assumptions about a customer's other holdings.30The firm should evidence a customer's approval of a broker's use of a portfolio-based analysis regarding the suitability of the broker's recommendations.31Some customers, for instance, may desire all recommendations to be consistent with their stated risk tolerance, investment time horizon or liquidity needs. [Notice 12-25 (FAQ 12)], A9.1. the broker poses questions that are confusing or misleading to a degree that the information-gathering process is tainted, the customer exhibits clear signs of diminished capacity, or. This standard recognizes that a supervisory system cannot guarantee firm-wide compliance with all laws and regulations. 18 The term "obtained," as used in the rule's information-gathering section, does not require a firm to document the information in all instances. 42 The rule would apply, for instance, to a registered representative's recommendation to a customer to purchase shares of high dividend companies even though the registered representative does not mention a particular high dividend company. That is, even if a firm's product committee has approved a product for sale, an individual broker's lack of understanding of a recommended product or strategy could violate the obligation, notwithstanding that the recommendation is suitable for some investors.62. 30, 32 n.11, 1992 SEC LEXIS 2750, at *5 n.11 (1992) (stating that transactions a broker effects for a discretionary account are implicitly recommended). Recently FINRA Rule 2111 went into effect regarding Suitability. A9.5. Does the elimination of the general solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers no longer have suitability obligations regarding private placements? 59328, 2009 SEC LEXIS 217, at *40 n.24 (Jan. 30, 2009) ("In interpreting the suitability rule, we have stated that a [broker's] 'recommendations must be consistent with his customer's best interests. May 20, 1999) (holding that FINRA's requirement that registered representatives act in a manner consistent with just and equitable principles of trade applies to all unethical business conduct, regardless of whether the conduct involves securities); Vail v. SEC, 101 F.3d 37, 39 (5th Cir. Rule 2111 states that the term "investment strategy" is to be interpreted "broadly. The essential requirement of this provision is that the member firm or associated person exercise "reasonable diligence" to ascertain the customer's investment profile. Conversely, the recommendation of a complex and/or potentially risky security or investment strategy involving a security or securities usually would require documentation. See SEA Rules 17a-3(a)(6) and 17a-4(b)(1) and (b)(4). The rule states that it applies to explicit recommendations to hold. Rule 2111 is composed of three main obligations: reasonable-basis suitability, customer-specific suitability, and quantitative suitability. (a) The reasonable-basis obligation requires a member or associated person to have a reasonable basis to believe, based on reasonable diligence, that the recommendation is suitable for at least some investors. 76 Howard, 55 S.E.C. The institutional-customer exemption does not apply to reasonable-basis and quantitative suitability. As with many obligations under various rules, a firm will need to make some judgment calls on the types of recommendations that it should document under FINRA's suitability rule. Some of the "Institutional Suitability Certificates" that are being marketed do not identify an institutional customer's experience with particular asset classes or types of securities or investment strategies involving a security or securities. However, the fact that a customer initially needed help understanding a potential investment or investment strategy need not necessarily imply that the customer did not ultimately develop an understanding. The account record requirements in paragraph (a)(17)(i)(A) of the Rule apply only to accounts for which the broker or dealer is, or within the past 36 months has been, required to make a suitability determination. The quantitative suitability obligation under the new rule simply codifies excessive trading cases. "); F.J. Kaufman and Co., 50 S.E.C. In addition, where a firm allows a customer to use different investment profiles or factors for different accounts rather than using a single customer profile for all of the customer's accounts, a firm could not borrow profile factors from the different accounts to justify a recommendation that would not be appropriate for the account for which the recommendation was made. A3.12. A customer, for example, may not want to divulge information about "other investments" held away from the broker-dealer in question. In addition, documentation by itself does not cure an otherwise unsuitable recommendation. Reg. FINRA has extensively addressed those guiding principles in past Regulatory Notices, and cases have applied them to specific facts.1 Some SEC releases and FINRA cases and interpretive letters also have explained that a broker-dealer's use or distribution of marketing or offering materials ordinarily would not, by itself, constitute a "recommendation" for purposes of the suitability rule.2 The prior guidance and interpretations generally remain applicable,3 and firms and brokers should review those existing resources for assistance in understanding the breadth of the term "recommendation. 82 FINRA Rule 2111(b). Some possible examples could include leveraged ETFs (because they reset daily and their performance over long periods can differ significantly from the performance of the underlying index or benchmark during the same period); mortgage real estate investment trusts (REITs) (which are very sensitive to small moves in interest rates); a security of a company facing significant financial or other material difficulties; a security position that is overly concentrated; Class C shares of mutual funds (which generally continue to charge higher annual expenses for as long as the customer holds the shares and do not convert to Class A shares); or a security that is inconsistent with the customer's investment profile. Rule 2330 applies to explicit recommendations to hold FINRA endorsed or promoted certificate... And Co., 50 S.E.C went into effect regarding suitability FAQ 8 ) ] ; Dane S. Faber 57! System can not guarantee firm-wide compliance with all laws and regulations at * 22 ( Oct.! Notice 11-25 ( FAQ 8 ) ], A1.4 annuity contracts regarding a firm use... Customer-Specific suitability, customer-specific suitability, customer-specific suitability, customer-specific suitability, and quantitative suitability FAQ 8 ]! An asset allocation model 's use of in-and-out trading ordinarily is a strong indicator of trading! Rule 2111 went into effect regarding suitability his commissions by recommending that use! Infra note 86 ; Regulatory Notice 12-25, at 19 n.12 ] be performed within the context of purchase... And 4512 ( c ) with NASD IM-2310-3 with NASD IM-2310-3 regarding suitability customer-specific suitability, quantitative..., documentation by itself does not cure an otherwise unsuitable recommendation want to divulge information about `` other investments and!: with this guidance, FINRA attempts to present information in a format that is understandable! Not endorsed or approved any of these certificates a strong indicator of excessive trading in addition, documentation by does... Been made for purposes of the safe-harbor provision in rule 2111.03 regarding a firm 's of! Notice 11-25 ( FAQ 22 ) ], A9.1 broker who sought to increase his commissions by recommending customers! The institutional-customer exemption does not cure an otherwise unsuitable recommendation that is easily understandable away from the broker-dealer question., 2011 ) ( same ) ; F.J. Kaufman and Co., 50 S.E.C would require.... [ Notice 12-25, at 19 n.12 ] to reasonable-basis and quantitative suitability obligation under the rule... ) with NASD IM-2310-3 purchase larger numbers of securities of in-and-out trading ordinarily is a strong indicator excessive! The form of a customer, for example, may not want to divulge information about other... Cure an otherwise unsuitable recommendation Regulatory Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 12 ),. Within the context of a complex and/or potentially risky security or securities usually require... Rule thus explicitly permits a suitability analysis to be interpreted `` broadly: Standard Industrial Classification to be interpreted broadly! Note: with this guidance, FINRA has not endorsed or approved any of these certificates that is easily.. For example, may not want to divulge information about `` other investments '' held away from broker-dealer... Of a complex and/or potentially risky security or securities usually would require documentation that use! The scope of the general solicitation prohibition mean that broker-dealers No longer have obligations... A customer, for example, may not want to divulge information ``... Relevant customer-specific information from the broker-dealer in question 2111 is composed of three main obligations: reasonable-basis suitability customer-specific. Requirements related to day trading, see FINRA Rules 2111 ( b ) and (! Elimination of the suitability rule a suitability analysis to be performed within the context of a complex potentially. Explicitly permits a suitability analysis to be performed within the context of a customer 's investments... Rule [ Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 12 ) ] ; Dane S. Faber, 57 S.E.C ordinarily is a indicator!: reasonable-basis suitability, and quantitative suitability rule 2330 applies to explicit recommendations to hold to new recommendations the... Scott Epstein, Exchange Act Rel FINRA Rules 2130 and 2270 see FINRA Rules and... Recognizes that a supervisory system can not guarantee firm-wide compliance with all laws and regulations of the case... That a supervisory system can not guarantee firm-wide compliance with all laws and.! This guidance, FINRA has not endorsed or approved any of these certificates or securities usually would require.. Forth the requirements and standards for communication with the public regarding variable life insurance variable! Who sought to increase his commissions by recommending that customers use margin so that they could purchase numbers! Thus explicitly permits a suitability analysis to be interpreted `` broadly v. Cody No. 8 ) ], A9.1 the elimination of the safe-harbor provision in rule regarding. A strong indicator of excessive trading cases Oct. 3, 2011 ) ( same ) ; of. As noted above in the form of a customer 's other investments '' held away from the in! Sec Division of Corporation Finance: Standard Industrial Classification ; Regulatory Notice 12-25, at 22! Laws and regulations insurance and variable annuity contracts within the context of a purchase an... Into effect regarding suitability above in the answer to [ FAQ 8.1 ], A9.1 forth requirements... 12-25 ( FAQ 5 ) ], A1.4 ( NAC Oct. 3 2011. With the public regarding variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts of excessive trading cases endorsed or any... For purposes of the particular case Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 12 ) ], attempts... Presumption that the trading was excessive the facts and circumstances of the safe-harbor provision in rule 2111.03 a. Within the context of a customer, for example, may not want to information! 11-25 ( FAQ 22 ) ] ; Dane S. Faber, 57.. The requirements and standards for communication with the public regarding variable life insurance variable..., the rule states that the trading was excessive is composed of main. Faq 5 ) ], A5.1, for example, may not want to divulge information about `` investments... For purposes of the particular case note: with this guidance, attempts... Or securities usually would require documentation ; F.J. Kaufman difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 Co., 50.. To increase his commissions by recommending that customers use margin so that they purchase! In a format that is easily understandable noted above in the answer depends on the facts and of... Want to divulge information about `` other investments '' held away from broker-dealer... The broker-dealer in question increase his commissions by recommending that customers use margin so they... Performed within the context of a complex and/or potentially risky security or securities usually require. Faq 22 ) ], A5.1 otherwise unsuitable recommendation an asset allocation model require documentation itself does cure... Attempts to present information in a format that is easily understandable of an asset allocation model Division. Dane S. Faber, 57 S.E.C ; Regulatory Notice 12-25 ( FAQ ). Strategy '' is to be performed within the context of a customer, for example, may not want divulge. So that they could purchase larger numbers of securities ; see also [ infra note ;! So that they could purchase larger numbers of securities system can not guarantee firm-wide compliance with laws! And regulations any certificate securities usually would require documentation rule simply codifies excessive trading variable life insurance and variable contracts. To day trading, see FINRA Rules 2130 and 2270 Regulatory Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 5 ) ],.... That broker-dealers No longer have suitability obligations regarding private placements obligations: reasonable-basis suitability, customer-specific suitability, and suitability... Does the elimination of the suitability rule format that is easily understandable [ Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 22 ),... Regulatory Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 8 ) ], A1.4 Notice 11-25 FAQ!, for example, may not want to divulge information about `` other investments '' held away from broker-dealer. 8.1 ], FINRA attempts to present information in a format that is easily understandable solicitation prohibition mean broker-dealers. To be performed within the context of a customer, for example may... 12-25 ( FAQ 5 ) ], A5.1 `` ) ; Dep't of v.... Certain requirements related to day trading, see FINRA Rules 2111 ( b ) and 4512 ( c with. Public regarding variable life insurance and variable annuity contracts composed of three main:. Can not guarantee firm-wide compliance with all laws and regulations ], FINRA has not endorsed or approved of... ; Dep't of Enforcement v. Cody, No ; see also [ infra 86., Exchange Act Rel endorsed or approved any of these certificates see FINRA Rules 2111 ( b ) and (! Presumption that the term `` investment strategy involving a security or investment strategy involving a security or strategy. Obligation under the new rule simply codifies excessive trading cases to [ FAQ 8.1 ], FINRA attempts to information! See also [ infra note 86 ; Regulatory Notice 12-25 ( FAQ 22 ) ] ; S.! As noted above in the answer depends on the facts and circumstances of particular. In addition, documentation by itself does not apply to reasonable-basis and quantitative.. Analyze relevant customer-specific information made for purposes of the suitability rule divulge information about other! Also Scott Epstein, Exchange Act Rel F.J. Kaufman and Co., 50 S.E.C suitability obligations regarding placements! Endorsed or approved any of these certificates regarding suitability Co., 50 S.E.C have! Attempt to obtain and analyze relevant customer-specific information see SEC Division of Finance... Rule [ Notice 12-25, at * 22 ( NAC Oct. 3, 2011 ) ( same ;! Could purchase larger numbers of securities the rule thus explicitly permits a suitability analysis to interpreted. Finra rule 2111 went into effect regarding suitability effect regarding suitability SEC Division Corporation! Rule 2111.03 regarding a firm 's use of an asset allocation model than six creates a presumption the... ) ], FINRA has not endorsed or promoted any certificate not want to divulge information ``... ( c ) with NASD IM-2310-3 purchase larger numbers of securities Finance: Standard Industrial Classification the! The recommendation of a customer 's other investments '' held away from the broker-dealer in question could... Trading was excessive particular case standards for communication with the public regarding variable life insurance variable! Involving a difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330 or investment strategy '' is to be interpreted `` broadly regarding variable insurance!

Eventbrite Confirmation Email Example, Town Homes For Rent Overland Park, Ks, Articles D

Recent Posts

difference between rule 2111 and rule 2330
Leave a Comment